Although the GRE ® Analytical Writing measure contains two discrete analytical writing tasks, an individual combined score is reported since it is more reliable than either task score alone. The score reported will represent the common of this scores when it comes to two tasks.
Score of 6 Outstanding
A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated critique regarding the argument and conveys meaning skillfully.
A typical paper in this category:
- clearly identifies important top features of the argument and analyzes them insightfully
- develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically and connects all of them with clear transitions
- effectively supports the key points associated with critique
- demonstrates control of language, including word that is appropriate and sentence variety
- demonstrates facility with all the conventions write my paper (in other words., grammar, usage and mechanics) of standard written English but might have errors that are minor
Score of 5 Strong
A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed critique associated with the argument and conveys meaning clearly.
A paper that is typical this category:
- clearly identifies important popular features of the argument and analyzes them in a way that is generally perceptive
- develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically and connects these with appropriate transitions
- sensibly supports the main points regarding the critique
- demonstrates control of language, including appropriate word choice and sentence variety
- demonstrates facility utilizing the conventions of standard written English, but might have minor errors
Score of 4 Adequate
A 4 paper presents a competent critique of this argument and conveys meaning adequately.
A typical paper in this category:
- identifies and analyzes important popular features of the argument
- develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily, but may well not connect all of them with transitions
- supports the key points for the critique
- demonstrates sufficient control of language to express ideas with reasonable clarity
- generally demonstrates control over the conventions of standard written English, but might have some errors
Score of 3 Limited
A 3 paper demonstrates some competence in its critique regarding the argument and in conveying meaning, but is obviously flawed.
A paper that is typical this category exhibits a number of of this following characteristics:
- will not identify or analyze a lot of the important popular features of the argument, however some analysis of the argument is present
- mainly analyzes tangential or irrelevant matters, or reasons poorly
- is limited in the development that is logical organization of ideas
- offers support of little relevance and value for points associated with critique
- lacks clarity in expressing ideas
- contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that will interfere with meaning
Score of 2 Seriously Flawed
A 2 paper demonstrates weaknesses that are serious analytical writing.
A paper that is typical this category exhibits one or more of this following characteristics:
- will not present a critique predicated on logical analysis, but may instead present the writer’s own views about the subject
- Does not develop ideas or is illogical and disorganized
- provides little if any relevant or reasonable support
- Has problems that are serious the usage of language and in sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning
- contains serious errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that frequently obscure meaning
Score of 1 Fundamentally Deficient
A 1 paper demonstrates deficiencies that are fundamental analytical writing.
A paper that is typical this category exhibits more than one of the following characteristics:
- provides little if any evidence of the capacity to understand and analyze the argument
- provides little if any proof of the capability to develop an organized response
- has severe problems in language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning
- contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that result in incoherence